| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
41. Stop high sec ganking/pve only option - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bubba Freedom wrote: I see no reason why a player that wants to run missions in high should be ganked. Came back to game a couple months ago and have lost 6 billion isk to high sec idiots/ null sec trolls. If a new player can't do anything in e...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 17:30:59
|
42. Spacefog DX11! Why you just don't remove that pointless feature? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And OP if you must insist that we can only have a game with real physics then we can't really have a game because real physics just won't allow space dogfighting as people generally perceive it. But if you must. There are people working towards...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 17:04:40
|
43. Spacefog DX11! Why you just don't remove that pointless feature? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Space is big. Really BIG ! For that reason space is also black. Really , black . When I think of space I think of the endless inky black that pervades the all. I don't think of clouds like cotton candy at the carnival. It would be nice if I c...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 16:50:32
|
44. Ripple Fire - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote: It actually offers a ton of utility across all weapon systems. Being able to stagger dps among guns results in more overall dps if the targets would perish mid volley. The negative is that you are not using your full fire...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 15:52:36
|
45. Ripple Fire - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
elitatwo wrote: He is asking for a battleship doomsday gun. I say nay. uummm, whatever. Maybe you'd like to bid on this bridge in New York City I got a good deal on. Brooklyn I think its name was. ShahFluffers wrote: Based on what I unde...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 15:26:00
|
46. Remove Planck Generator Restriction on Packaged Planck Generator Ite... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: this is do to the unholy marriage of the database and legacy code you will notice player folders in eve never go more than three layer this is not only containers but also BM and notes even when it does like in a double...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 14:30:32
|
47. Quantum Anchors (defining interesting gameplay choices) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
When Command Destroyers were introduced more than a few players asked that the Higgs Rig provide just what you are asking for. It seemed like a good idea because the benefit (not being jumped) came with the nasty side effects. EvE should always ha...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 14:19:12
|
48. Mining and Industry War Declaration Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
My corp pays CONCORD a bribe (aka a WarDec) to look the other way so we can attack your corp. You want to rebribe CONCORD to cancel my corps WarDec. So I just rebribe them back. What you are asking for is a bidding war for WarDecs. What happens wh...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.09.04 13:42:21
|
49. Ripple Fire - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Battleship broadsides are the most satisfying way to discharge large numbers of guns but on the off chance a player would prefer to have their guns firing spaced more evenly they are stuck trying to time their activation clicks carefully. In the...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.28 18:34:42
|
50. CONCORD and the monopoly on Violence. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solecist Project wrote: You're nuts for saying carebears create and PvPers destroy. PvPers also mine and do PvE! You apply carebear logic! Yes they do, but not when they are in destruct mode. You can't create with a bomb or a gun. 50% of the...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.28 16:39:39
|
51. CONCORD and the monopoly on Violence. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brokk Witgenstein wrote: ... those links don't open? I changed the shortener.
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.28 15:36:37
|
52. CONCORD and the monopoly on Violence. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brokk Witgenstein wrote: Solecist Project wrote: Evolution means you either adapt or you die. Without Pain there is no evolution ... ... and without evolution there is no moving forward. Who should hold the monopoly on violence? And why ...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.27 20:56:57
|
53. CONCORD and the monopoly on Violence. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solecist Project wrote: I can conclude this with two questions: Who should hold the monopoly on violence? And why don't we take it back? TLDR; "If I hurt someone I have to pay the price for my crime and I don't like it!!! Waahhh!" Some t...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.27 20:42:15
|
54. Positive Security Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote: Most people have answered the questions posed already but Ill add my two cents. Way back in the day you could go up to +10 standing as well as -10. But it was so easy to go into null and rat for a single day or two to...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.24 21:25:45
|
55. Positive Security Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
W33b3l wrote: Although I've always felt that loosing sec status in lowsec (other then podding) is kind of stupid because theres not any authorities out there to see it happen. It's the shared Jove technology. Capsuleers and Concord are both ...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.24 21:23:06
|
56. Warping - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lex Gabinia wrote: Yang Aurilen wrote: If you can watch this without blanking out you are a true eve player otherwise GB2WoW Nah, this is the real test. There's worse.
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.22 22:10:48
|
57. Dev Response to Open Letter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Looblaloobla Timmay wrote: Solecist Project wrote: Please know that this was actually a part of my above post. :p In case you need translations to cross-reference a true sandbox ... ... where actual children play in ... ... with EVE-ONLINE t...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.22 20:56:05
|
58. Dev Response to Open Letter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Our vast, open sandbox has been deemed old, outdated, and unattractive - so it is being transformed before our eyes into a playground, complete with shiny new slides and play equipment (OK, they are the cheesy modern pl...
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.22 20:35:36
|
59. CCPlease > Niarja & Uedama = lowsec systems with ban for +sup... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Callitari Mundani wrote: Hello, Niarja & Uedama are "Hi-sec systems", there is already too much ganking around which limits the anti-ganker pilots to reactive actions, I suggest we do these systems lowsec so we could have fun all day long....
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.22 19:48:20
|
60. Economic review Feb-July 2016 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: That first post there... is this what happens when financially obsessed people with Aspergers don a tinfoil hat? Don't forget the tequila. NEVER FORGET THE TEQUILA!!
- by Dornier Pfeil - at 2016.08.12 19:07:15
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |